<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet Explorer 6 Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/2009/12/18/the-internet-explorer-6-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/2009/12/18/the-internet-explorer-6-debate/</link>
	<description>Creative web and design consultants in Chichester, Bournemouth and London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/2009/12/18/the-internet-explorer-6-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/?p=652#comment-106</guid>
		<description>@mark - 22% is slightly concerning and thanks for the browser market share recommendations

@ian - like your statement of browser compatibility, thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark &#8211; 22% is slightly concerning and thanks for the browser market share recommendations</p>
<p>@ian &#8211; like your statement of browser compatibility, thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Perkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/2009/12/18/the-internet-explorer-6-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/?p=652#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Just a minor point - those W3 Schools browser stats are for their own website and as such are not representative of the market share of browsers as a whole (that site is focussed around web dev and the people that visit it are much more likely to be on a better browser, so the results are pretty skewed).

A much better overall view comes from net applications:

Browser market share: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0
Browser version market share: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&amp;qptimeframe=M&amp;qpsp=130&amp;qpct=3&amp;qpmr=5

Which pegs IE 6 at 22 percent(ish) currently, nearly a quarter of general web traffic still. Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minor point &#8211; those W3 Schools browser stats are for their own website and as such are not representative of the market share of browsers as a whole (that site is focussed around web dev and the people that visit it are much more likely to be on a better browser, so the results are pretty skewed).</p>
<p>A much better overall view comes from net applications:</p>
<p>Browser market share: <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0" rel="nofollow">http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0</a><br />
Browser version market share: <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&amp;qptimeframe=M&amp;qpsp=130&amp;qpct=3&amp;qpmr=5" rel="nofollow">http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&amp;qptimeframe=M&amp;qpsp=130&amp;qpct=3&amp;qpmr=5</a></p>
<p>Which pegs IE 6 at 22 percent(ish) currently, nearly a quarter of general web traffic still. Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/2009/12/18/the-internet-explorer-6-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strawberrysoup.co.uk/?p=652#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Ongoing Vista / Windows 7 should further help matters, as IE6 is simply a no-go there..

The get-out I used on the most recent spec. document I wrote was something along the lines of:

The site will be tested for compatibility with the majority of current browsers, including Firefox 2.x -3.5, Safari 2.x – 4.x, Google Chrome, Opera 10, Internet Explorer 7 – 8. No guarantee of visual consistency can be made on legacy browsers older than 5 years.

.. which I think is fair enough. If customers have an issue with that, I usually engage in a discussion as to what point they would consider it unrealistic to continue offering support for their own products. When put in that context, IE6 is often given the heave-ho..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ongoing Vista / Windows 7 should further help matters, as IE6 is simply a no-go there..</p>
<p>The get-out I used on the most recent spec. document I wrote was something along the lines of:</p>
<p>The site will be tested for compatibility with the majority of current browsers, including Firefox 2.x -3.5, Safari 2.x – 4.x, Google Chrome, Opera 10, Internet Explorer 7 – 8. No guarantee of visual consistency can be made on legacy browsers older than 5 years.</p>
<p>.. which I think is fair enough. If customers have an issue with that, I usually engage in a discussion as to what point they would consider it unrealistic to continue offering support for their own products. When put in that context, IE6 is often given the heave-ho..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
